Islamaphobic or Realist

This is a really strange story that I have had tucked back in my holding pattern for some time.  thCC2T6ZM0It is a topic I have not heard discussed in main steam media here in the US. I am sure this post will generate a lot of controversial mail but honestly, whether one is pro-Islamic immigration or against, this is a matter that needs to be analyzed and prepared for by any invitational nation.  Discussing the actual repercussions of a serious health issue in a specific religious group should not result in being labeled Islamaphobic!

This is an election year where legal and illegal immigrationth (85) as well as the wisdom of refugee status have been widely discussed. People argue about the need for us to be welcoming to fleeing refugees from war torn regions regardless of our concerns.  The hot topic of massive Muslim immigration to countries in Europe is generally accompanied by alarming stories of crime, rape and violence. President Obama recently chastised us for objecting and assured us that we will be accepting thousands of these refugees, whether or not the individual states agree.  This is a huge, controversial issue on many levels5a96984a34dfb56e0a329fd75e63e954yet the discussion  thus far has been primarily focused on the need for screening for dangerous characters, overwhelming a particular countries housing or welfare rolls, economic concerns, and worries of losing ones nation’s national voice with such diverse new demographics.


Those are all valid and serious concerns to be weighed carefully by any country.  However,  the following article and additional sourcing, introduces a dark issue of which there is little discussion or awareness here in the west. The preponderance of genetic abnormalities in this “religious” population as described below are liable to totally overwhelm any state or nation’s capacity to adequately care and deal with the long term implications of these poor souls.

This seems to be a self-inflicted genetic issue confined to a specific demographic which insists on ignoring longstanding science on the topic.  Perhaps, the mullahs and leaders of some of these Islamic countries would be better served to leave off hateful rhetoric and saber rattling threats and regardless of what Mohammed did in his lifetime, educate their people to stop this custom and widen their tainted gene poolthCLFQR5LD .

That being said, the sad fact remains that the repercussions of widespread, close-cousin inbreeding are many and far-reaching. In an age where Health care costs, and long term therapies of all sorts are rising. Regardless of what Bernie Sanders and Hillary promises voters there is no such thing as a “free” anything.  “Free services” aren’t really free at all and the government has no money of their own to spend.  It is ours, yours and mine, no matter what party you vote for. thK1SX92NLNo matter what the other social costs attached to massive refugee issues, this is a problem that is going to be expensive for a long time!

The implications of admitting large numbers of a single religion where the rates of birth defects and insanity may prove to be dramatically and notably higher in proportion to the general public carries thOAUWW2ZY with it a cost  much greater than just educating , housing or worrying about Sharia Law coming to your neighborhood.

We don’t live in a one-issue vacuum, either.  Religious objections aside, there are other looming expensive problems we face in America such as a 19 Trillion Dollar deficit, failing infrastructure, unbelievably low “real” employment numbers, and an aging population of Baby Boomers who already wonder how Social Security math will equate with a much smaller population to sustain the program.homeless-young-iraq-war-veteran-begging-on-34th-street-in-new-york-D9PEPM  America currently has a massive preponderance of it’s own long-term disabled of all sorts and ages, mental health patients and sick, aging veterans that are already woefully, if not criminally, underserved in this country. Why are they underserved? Because that kind of endless, high intensity care is really, really expensive and very hands on.

Even setting aside all of the other valid objections to this issue and with the full realization that this is a difficult issue to find information or statistics about, we as a nation need to fully count the “true” cost of inviting this type of burden–that seems to be accepted and still ongoing in Islamic populations- in an already precarious era in our history.

Half of world’s Muslims are inbred due to generations of incest on by

A never-spoken-about problem with Muslims is their inbreeding as a result of their long and deeply-ingrained practice of marrying first cousins — a practice that has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses.

More than 7 years ago, the UK’s environment minister Phil Woolas had sounded the alarm about this “very sensitive” issue that is “rarely debated”. Referring to the culture of arranged marriages between cousins in the Muslim immigrant community, Woolas said: “If you have a child with your cousin the likelihood is there’ll be a genetic problem.

Woolas, whose views are supported by medical experts, said most cases occur in immigrant families from rural Pakistan, where up to half of all marriages involve first cousins. Woolas said: “If you talk to any primary care worker they will tell you that levels of disability among the . . . Pakistani population are higher than the general population. And everybody knows it’s caused by first cousin marriage.”

The problem is made worse by generational inbreeding. As Woolas put it, “Many of the parents themselves and many of the public spokespeople are themselves products of first cousin marriages.” That would explain why research for BBC2’s Newsnight in November 2005 showed that British Pakistanis accounted for 3.4% of all births but 30% of all British children with recessive genetic disorders.

Indeed, an entry in Wikipedia confirms that “Cousin marriages in Muslim majority countries are often preferred and even encouraged in some regions,” and points to the fact that prophet Muhammad himself had married cousins.

But the problem isn’t exclusive to Pakistani Muslims as Woolas seems to imply, but is pandemic among Muslims across the world.

Nicolai Sennels

According to Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Muslim inbreeding, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred:

  • 70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
  • 67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
  • 64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
  • 63% of Sudanese are inbred.
  • 60% of Iraqis are inbred.
  • 54% of Muslims in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
  • 25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
  • In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
  • In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

Sennels points out that cousin marriage was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

Sennels warns that massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to Muslims’ intelligence, sanity, and health. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

Below are the consequences of inbreeding:

1. Birth and birth defects:

  • 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.
  • 50% increase in the risk that the child dies during labor.
  • The risk of autosomal recessive genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher.
  • The risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.

2. Physical and mental retardation and illnesses:

  • The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
  • The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness, i.e., insanity.
  • Social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”
  • Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by 400% among children of cousin marriages.

child born with 16 toes

All of which would explain the following phenomena among Muslims (Source: Nicolai Sennels):

  • 1 out of every 3 Somalis are mentally ill.
  • More than 40% of the patients in Denmark‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant (i.e., Muslim) background.
  • One-third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a “foreign” (i.e., Muslim) background.
  • In Denmark, psychologist Sennels’ native country, “non-Western” immigrants (who are mainly Muslim) are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
  • In Denmark, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education.
  • 64% of school children with Arabic parents in Denmark are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
  • The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.

Muslims’ average lower IQ means a lowered ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking, which would explain why:

  • The Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does. In the last 1,200 years years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year.
  • 7 out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
  • Only 9 Muslims had ever won the Nobel Prize, and 5 of those 9 were for the “Peace Prize.”
  • According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).


Sennels concludes:

The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “Islamophobe” and a “racist.”

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects….

Let us keep in mind that Muslims are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of Islam….

In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-Muslim.”

Additional sources:

Similar research was reported as far back as 2005 when the BBC Newsnight launched a investigation revealing that just British Pakistani’s who accounted for 3.4% of all births but have 30% of all British Children with recessive disorders. (

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Islamaphobic or Realist

  1. This is a sad post. It is scary, but it is very sad. I don’t look forward to the discussion, because some people would rather be sensational than sensible. I pray our leaders will use some measure of good sense and stop the insanity. I can’t imagine what to blame for our cultural and political insanity, but if we start taking in Muslims in large numbers, we will certainly contribute yet another cause to the list. I grieve for the Muslims themselves, who are the people most harmed by this practice, but I see no reason for the US to take it on.

    • says:

      Yes, and it is hard to know just how big an issue it is because it is such an insular society. Something to keep an eye on, for sure.

  2. Patti says:

    Wow, thanks for this article. Never thought of this. Did not know that they married first cousins.

Leave a Reply